Will there be gains for the Syrian regime out of the electric linkage agreement between Jordan and Lebanon?

Will there be gains for the Syrian regime out of the electric linkage agreement between Jordan and Lebanon?

Will there be gains for the Syrian regime out of the electric linkage agreement between Jordan and Lebanon?


On January 27, 2022, Lebanon signed an agreement to draw electricity from Jordan through Syria with a technical daily capacity of 225 megawatts. The draft agreement was prepared in October 2021. It included the transmission of electricity through an Eight Line system to Lebanon from Jordan via Syria, after the line was under maintenance in the latter, as its readiness was announced by the Minister of Electricity weeks after the draft agreement was made.  

According to the agreement a kilowatt is priced at $0.15, to be paid by Lebanon to Jordan directly without the Syrian regime receiving any money, but rather an 8% of the total transferred energy (about 18 megabytes)- which will be used to serve Syrian regime-controlled areas- as transit fees. It is worth mentioning that the World Bank guaranteed the payment of the amounts owed to Jordan in the form of a loan granted to Lebanon in the event that it falters financially in making the payments or was going through bad economic conditions.

It is estimated that the regime-controlled areas need 4,000 megawatts of electricity per day if the minimum amount of electric power is operated.  Although the share that the regime will receive is only 4.5 per thousand of its needs, it considers the agreement as a gain economically and politically: 

- Economically, the regime can unofficially obtain amounts of electricity through surreptitiously connecting with the net and claiming that the equipment is leaking; and as such, it gets a bigger amount of electricity or sums of money to repair or maintain the decaying network.

- Politically, the regime views the agreement as an inseparable part of its efforts to achieve the goals it seeks like rehabilitation and ending the Arab and international isolation imposed on it.

The World Bank is expected to respond to the agreement by April 2022. It has already set 3 conditions for financing the agreement; namely, raising the cost of electricity in Lebanon at least to the cost price, improving collection processes across the country, and eliminating all infringements on the network.  If Lebanon is; however, able to respond to the first condition, it will face difficulty fulfilling the other two conditions, especially with the control of the Hezbollah armed militias on its land.

Moreover, the approval of the World Bank on financing the process is expected to be closely conditioned by the results of the IMF talks currently under-way in Lebanon, which makes operating the electricity in the interconnection project more difficult than it appears. That in turn will undermine the Syrian regime’s hopes to benefit from it.

Share this Post

Why did Emirati FM again fly to Damascus?
In focus

An Emirati delegation headed by the United Arab Emirates foreign minister, Abdullah bin Zayed Al Al Nahyan on January 4, 2023 made a visit to the Syrian capital, Damascus, and met the head of the Syrian regime, Bashar al -Assad. This visit is the second to Syria after the return of diplomatic relations between the two parties late 2018.

Syria during 2022
Analytical Report

An analytical report released by the Jusoor Center for Studies monitors the various stages that the Syrian issue went through during 2022, politically, militarily and economically. The report addresses the political process, the movements of the Astana track, the UN Security Council meetings on Syria, the policies of international actors, and others.

The Israeli strikes in Syria during 2022

In 2013, Israel started launching air strikes on Syria, which fall within the strategy of the "Campaign between Wars (CBW)"; where it considers it necessary to weaken the capabilities of the enemy (Iran and its militias or military units) and respond to threats outside the borders.

Russia and restructuring the Syrian regime forces: Obstacles and alternatives

The Syrian regime attached great importance to the army. It took the slogan “No sound is louder than the battle's one” as an instrument for harnessing all the material and human capabilities to serve the effectiveness of the army's operations in order to maintain its control over the country's areas. The regime also works hard to take advantage of the above-mentioned slogan to serve its regional a