What is behind Hayat Tahrir al-Sham’s Moves to Restructure

What is behind Hayat Tahrir al-Sham’s Moves to Restructure

In focus| What is behind Hayat Tahrir al-Sham’s Moves to Restructure
In an interview in February 2020, abu Mohammed al-Golani, the head of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) listed several reasons for the successive losses experienced in the recent military campaign. He indicated that HTS and the remaining factions needed to develop a coherent organizational structure to avoid further complications.
It appears that HTS suffers not only from its weak military performance, but also from organizational inconsistencies due to its units and sectors’ lack of hierarchically and administrative organization. As a response, the HTS leadership accelerated the development of hierarchical structure by merging its military sectors into three military brigades and appointing new leaders for them while transferring other leaders to new positions.
It is necessary to note that the announcement of this step was made after Abu Malik al-Telli, a prominent HTS leader, released a statement indicating his resignation from HTS. Soon after his announcement, other HTS leaders confirmed his return to its ranks, but al-Telli has issued no official confirmation so far.  
The restructuring within HTS can be analyzed from three aspects:
• During this state of calm and ongoing ceasefire, the HTS leadership is invested in organizing its ranks and shifting the power balances within HTS for the older members, forming blocs, to be repositioned alongside new recruits to avoid the attrition that HTS and all other parties to the conflict in Syria have experienced.
• Ensure meeting the needs of the situation and working on developing a more centralized military hierarchy commanded by stricter leaders loyal to al-Golani. HTS has exploited the situation to marginalize extremist and internationally unacceptable names from the leadership in an effort to demonstrate its reliance on moderate local fighters and leaders.
• Attempting to satisfy objections within the organization concerning its military performance and its organizational weakness by forming these brigades and assigning leadership tasks to military figures known for their performances within HTS.
The HTS leadership is aware that the organization will not continue indefinitely, and, through these steps, it seeks to reformulate its factions to appear to transform into an umbrella formation that is more inclusive. Through these measures, HTS is working to enhance its civil presence and entrench itself into local and relief councils as well as continue to restructuring its military and security system that allows it to continue playing a role in the scenarios of the new scene.

 Unit of Religious Movement - Jusoor for Studies

To visit the English Telegram channel: Click here

Share this Post

Why did Emirati FM again fly to Damascus?
In focus

An Emirati delegation headed by the United Arab Emirates foreign minister, Abdullah bin Zayed Al Al Nahyan on January 4, 2023 made a visit to the Syrian capital, Damascus, and met the head of the Syrian regime, Bashar al -Assad. This visit is the second to Syria after the return of diplomatic relations between the two parties late 2018.

Syria during 2022
Analytical Report

An analytical report released by the Jusoor Center for Studies monitors the various stages that the Syrian issue went through during 2022, politically, militarily and economically. The report addresses the political process, the movements of the Astana track, the UN Security Council meetings on Syria, the policies of international actors, and others.

The Israeli strikes in Syria during 2022

In 2013, Israel started launching air strikes on Syria, which fall within the strategy of the "Campaign between Wars (CBW)"; where it considers it necessary to weaken the capabilities of the enemy (Iran and its militias or military units) and respond to threats outside the borders.

Russia and restructuring the Syrian regime forces: Obstacles and alternatives

The Syrian regime attached great importance to the army. It took the slogan “No sound is louder than the battle's one” as an instrument for harnessing all the material and human capabilities to serve the effectiveness of the army's operations in order to maintain its control over the country's areas. The regime also works hard to take advantage of the above-mentioned slogan to serve its regional a